楼主好样的。不仅单一文件内有矛盾或不清楚的地方，之后的文件也有和这一份不符的地方，包括无人机的分类与运行环境。因为这份是民航系统与无人机相关的最早文件，所以漏洞最多。之后还有三份。共四份文件中有两个AC（advisory circular资讯通告），一个通知，一个MD（management document）。其中，两份AC和通知都是民航局飞标司发布的，AC-61-FS-2013-20 和通知将无人机操作人员资质管理交给了某协会，AC-91-FS-2015-31 规定无人机运行需要连入某云系统。这也是为什么我对这种做法极度反感的原因。MD和大家关系没那么密切，是民航局空管办发布的，是针对空管部门的行业内部管理文件。至于AC的法律效力，大家可以试着理解一下：Advisory circular (AC) refers to a type of publication offered by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to provide guidance for compliance with [Airworthiness, pilot certification, operational standards, training standards, and any other rules within the 14 CFR Aeronautics and Space Title.]. They define acceptable means, but not the only means, of accomplishing or showing compliance with airworthiness regulations.[1] Generally informative in nature, Advisory Circulars are neither binding nor regulatory; yet some have the effect of de facto standards or regulations.Advisory circulars typically refer to industry standards from SAE and RTCA. Some Advisory circulars are only a few pages long and do little more than reference a recommended standard. 这个定义是Wiki上的，FAA就相当于CAAC啦。最后附件，再次供大家学习讨论：http://pan.baidu.com/s/1cEiqEa
|
来自苹果客户端
/1 
发表于 2017-5-4 17:41
收藏
楼主
